CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE ESSAY "Bromides and Sulphites" FOR ADP/B.SC. ENGLISH STUDENTS.
Frank Gelett Burgess
was a US humorous and one of the modern American writers. He earned much fame
in the field of literature and humorous writings were his specialty. In an
interesting and funny manner , Burgess , in his essay “Bromides and Sulphites” , divides people into two large groups
i.e. Brimide and Sulphite. All the people of the world fall into one category
or the other. The Bromides are in bulk. A bromide is a man of average
intelligence and personality. A Bromide is given the name of Philistine ,
Conservative or bore. He follows the main travelled roads and goes with the
crowd. He is predictable in his opinions upon any given subject he follows old
customs and wears common costume.
Usually Bromides are greedy and self centered persons. They run
after material gains. They are uncultured and uncivilized people. They are dull
and uninteresting.
They are also conservative in their clothes , manners and ideas.
They obey the law of average. They follow a set pattern of life. They have a
dull and mechanical life. They worship dogmas. They follow the things
sanctioned by majority.
Usually a Bromide is not innovative. He cannot think about fresh
ideas. his train of thoughts can never get off the track. A Bromide is also
dull to the sense of beauty. An artist and his work fail to attain an emotional
response from him. He always offers dull and routine arguments on every issue
of life.
On the other hand , a Sulphite is a genius or an extra ordinary
intellectual person. According to Burgess , a Sulphite is a person who does his
own thinking. He is explosive. No one can predict his opinion upon any given
subject. It is never known , what he will say or do. No one can foresee his
doings. He may shock or please us by his sudden or spontaneous actions.
The Sulphites do not exist in large number. However all reformers,
cranks and artist all are Sulphites. They not only do ordinary things in
unusual ways but they also do unusual things in ordinary ways. He follows his
own pattern of behaviour.
In order to illustrate his point , Burgess gives us examples of
two classes of people from history and literature.
William Shakespeare wrote
a very famous tragedy of Hamlet. Here Hamlet happens to
be imaginative and sensitive character. He is a sulphite. As through out the
play his actions are unpredictable.
Then Becky Sharp is an
imaginative and emotional character of Thackery’s
novel “Vanity Fair”. She is
Sulphite. Amelia Sedley is another
character of the same book. She is original in her thinking. Her actions are
quite predictable. More over she follows a set pattern of life. She has no
innovation. So she is a Sulphite.
Dr Roosevelt of the USA was
a Sulphite. He was the president of America. He was very popular among
the people for his extra ordinary policies. But his predecessor President
Herbert Hoover was a Bromide. He was the set pattern and the set policies. He
did not give anything new to his people.
G.B. Shaw was a great Irish playwright. He was a Sulphite. He was
an original thinker. His plays recollected his brilliant ideas.
Marie Corelli , another writer of G.B. Shaw’s time was a Bromide.
His writings were dull and uninteresting.
Dr. Johnson was a Sulphite , but his writings were Bromidic. Lewis
Carroll , who wrote “Alice in wonderland” was a Sulphite. He had extraordinary
ideas about different characters and situations. But in his private life he was
a Bromidic.
Samuel Johnson was a prose writer of great order. But he was
Bomidic.
So it means some people are Bromides whereas some are Sulphites.
Some people are Bromides where as there work is Sulphitic , and some are
Suphites and their works are Bromidic.
Bromide
Dull Sulphites
interesting
Predictable unpredictable
Boring interesting
Conservative innovative
Self centered wider
view
Uncultured cultured
Uncivilized civilized
Materialistic genius
Plz give me quotation for this lesson
ReplyDelete